|
Feedback
from the Trainees
In general, the trainees liked this program and
think they learned a lot. Many of them expressed interests for further
cooperation with me. The following is a summary of all the training
evaluation forms collected from the trainees. The MPDI staff members
completed the work of delivering, collecting and summarizing the
evaluation forms.
SUMMARY RESULTS
OF EVALUATION by MPDI
|
1. What is your assessment on the sessions of
the programme
- Why
Impact Assessment
- Planning
and Organization SIA
- SIA
methods I
- SIA
methods II
- How
to do forecasting
- Use
of Techniques
- Integration
and Institutionalization
- Formulation
of Indicators
|
Very
Useful
|
Mostly
Useful
|
Useful
|
Not
Useful
|
|
7
3
2
2
5
5
4
4
|
3
6
5
5
3
-
6
4
|
3
4
5
5
5
8
3
5
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|
2.
What topics do you feel, should have been dealt in more detail ?
|
TOPICS
|
|
1. Use of Techniques
|
|
2.
Formulation of Indicators
|
|
3.
Awareness
among the people
|
|
4.
Social Mobilization
for SIA
|
|
5.
Differences between EIA
& SIA
|
|
6.
How to identify Social
Impact Area
|
|
7.
The methods & examples of SIA Integration
into Decision Making
|
|
8.
Definitions of all Technical
Jargon
|
|
9.
The Process of a
SIA
|
3.
How confident you are as a trainer in SIA to train your fellow
Officers?
|
Status
|
Average
|
Moderate
|
Fairly
|
Very Confident
|
|
N.of
Persons
|
1
|
2
|
7
|
4
|
4.
What do you suggest more important from the following.
N. of Persons
i.
More training is needed on the subject.
1
ii.
Training techniques and methods are to be thought
3
iii.
A training manual is essential
9
iv.
Follow up, short programmes are needed
1
5.
In your opinion what are the 'strengths' of the program
i.
Resource Persons
ii.
Selections of diverse participants/Mixture of the participants
iii.
Group discussions/Brainstorming sessions/Presentations
iv.
Co-ordination
v.
Topic is International & National need
vi.
Introducing a ‘new subject’ in a trainee friendly manner
vii.
MPDI is pivotal role
viii.
Ministry level Network
6.
In your opinion what are the 'weaknesses' of the programme
i.
Lack of different Training
Methods
ii.
Poor lessons planning
iii.
Lack of Reading Materials
iv.
Lack of required facilities
– ie. Internet
v.
Field Visits have not
been included ( to study impacts in the immediate environment of the
Hotel)
vi.
More time is allocated to Theoretical
aspects
vii.
Reading Materials not
given in advance
viii.
Absence of Training
Objectives
ix
No Multi Media
Presentations
x
Lack of Role Play
xi
Foreign Trainer’s
Expressions was not clear
7.
Any suggestions to improve future programmes of this nature
i.
Workshop facilities -
ie. Printers/Desktop computers/Internet connections
ii.
Reference materials
iii.
Adequately plan, Prepare in details, Present lively
iv.
Training needs assessment
v.
Field visits/ Video presentations/Training methodologies
vi.
Practical situations should be discussed
vii.
Much Group works
viii.
Share responsibilities
|
8.
Overall what is your opinion on the following aspects
a. Relevance
& contents
b. Efficiency
of delivery of the
lectures by resource persons.
Topic 1 : Impact on Public Policies &
Programmes on the Poor in SL.
Topic 2 : Experience of Public Sector Large
Scale Dev. Programmes
Topic 3 : Impacts of Health & Nutritional
Policies & Programmes
Topic 4 : MDGs
c. Effectiveness
in terms of their
contribution
d. Logistics
I.
Food and beverages
II.
Accommodation
III.
Lecture room & setting arrangement
IV.
Presentation facilities
V.
Other services
|
Excellent
|
Satisfactory
|
Partly
Satisfactory
|
Not
Satisfactory
|
|
3
2
2
3
2
1
2
-
|
11
7
8
8
9
7
11
13
|
-
4
-
1
2
1
-
-
|
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
|
|
5
5
6
3
-
|
7
7
4
6
6
|
2
2
4
5
6
|
-
-
-
-
-
|
|
9. How do you rate the overall
programme
|
Highly
Successful
|
Very
Successful
|
Moderately Successful
|
Not
Successful
|
|
1
|
7
|
6
|
-
|
BACK
|